Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 6526
Date:
Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


http://www.kentsportsnews.com/welling-united-v-gloucester-city-preview-09-02-2018/



__________________

I know I'm biased. What's wrong with that?



Playmaker

Status: Offline
Posts: 318
Date:
Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


#WUFC:

1Vose
2Driver
3Johnson
4Dymond (C)
5Acheampong
6Parkinson
7Monakana
8Durojaiye
9Goldberg
10Healy
11Hall

__________________


Playmaker

Status: Offline
Posts: 412
Date:
RE: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


20180210_142609.jpg



Attachments
__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1712
Date:
RE: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


0-0 Half Time. Very poor from
Welling so far



__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1712
Date:
RE: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


Bradbrook on for Hall



__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1712
Date:
Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


0-1 Can't say it wasn't coming.

__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1712
Date:
RE: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


1-1 Goldberg!



__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1712
Date:
Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


Nanetti on for monokana

__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1712
Date:
Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


Jebb on for Durojaiwe

__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1712
Date:
Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


1-2

__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1712
Date:
Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


Penalty to Welling

__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1712
Date:
RE: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


2-2 Goldberg pen



__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1712
Date:
RE: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


2-3



__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1712
Date:
RE: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


2-3 Full Time



__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1092
Date:
RE: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


Disappointing to say the least, they were far more up for it than we were. Why do we have games where the players lack that determination to get on top of the opposition?



__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1514
Date:
RE: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


OldOak2 wrote:

Disappointing to say the least, they were far more up for it than we were. Why do we have games where the players lack that determination to get on top of the opposition?


 Great goal by Nanetti though



__________________


Playmaker

Status: Offline
Posts: 318
Date:
Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


www.thenationalleague.org.uk/match-info/match-centre/1-2850750

__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2424
Date:
RE: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


Well I am still a little perplexed as to how that game finished 3-2 to Gloucester after being 0-0 at half time! Suffice to say their game management was far far better than ours throughout the game and they were very clinical with their finishing (especially with the second goal!) It was never going to be a pretty game in those conditions but, as the manager alluded to in his interview, there were far too many players below par and not doing the simple things properly. It wasn't a game for passing/dribbling in certain areas of the pitch but for turning the other team round, putting them on the back foot and taking advantage of mistakes. We got back into the game twice due to some suspect goalkeeping and suspect refereeing yet we still didn't have the nous to get a point out of the game?! A sign of a good team is to play poorly yet still pick up results and we had a point gifted to us twice on Saturday only to give them back the extra two points.

There were signs in the first half of defensive problems and it was always going to take a few games to try and bed in yet another keeper. Johnson made a couple of very late interceptions and was probably our best player first half. And how many times have you seen a National South centre half trying Cruyff turns on the edge of his own penalty area ffs?! It was not a game for pretty stuff but for doing the basics and some of our defending would not have looked out of place over Danson Park on a Sunday morning...I thought that the new fella Hall certainly tried hard and offered plenty of commitment but some of his delivery was poor and he tried to dribble the ball too many times in the wrong areas. On the other hand he offered more than the other winger - I trust someone took 12 quid off him after the game as that is the going rate these days for watching a game at PVR.

We only have a squad of 16 currently but normally we have got some good impact from players off the bench but, if anything, it got worse after the changes. Bradbrook was a real threat in the air earlier in the season but he only won one header that I can recall on Saturday and didn't get hold off the ball at all - his form and/or fitness seem to have deserted him. I am not quite sure what Nanetti was trying to do for their second goal but I have never seen him connect with a shot like that at the other end! One of the things I don't understand with the substitutions is that basically we end up moving one of our best players (and biggest goal threats) from the number 10 role to left midfield and then to central midfield all in a little over 10 minutes...?!

Some big decisions to make for tomorrow's game but we are limited in the changes to personnel and shape simply by the numbers we are currently running with. The manager wanted to take a back seat and manage and now he has to do that and pick the right team to do the job regardless of sentiment. Bognor have been struggling all season and haven't won at home for ever so we need to go there, play positively, do the basics properly and, above all, adapt far more quickly to the conditions than we did at the weekend.

Up the Wings! 



__________________


First X1 Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 213
Date:
Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


Following the previous game against Braintree, I don't see how a player should be able to just walk into the side (Hall).
What sort of message does that send to your team?
Thought that performance (Braintree) was one of the best of the season.
So how do you reward your team, by starting with a new player.
That will no doubt get the players all wanting to play for you.

__________________
x


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 6526
Date:
RE: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


Jamie Coyle said that Nanetti had taken a knock so Hall got the nod over him. He was disappointed as he has yet to field an unchanged team (although there was a goalkeeper on debut too).



__________________

I know I'm biased. What's wrong with that?



First X1 Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 213
Date:
Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


Was there no other alternative?
Jebb?

__________________
x


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 5405
Date:
Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


I think Coyle has to play...one of our better players is on the bench



__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 6526
Date:
RE: Welling United v Gloucester City match thread
Permalink  
 


Hoof it wrote:

Was there no other alternative?
Jebb?


 Yes, but it would still have been a change to the starting line up from the previous game.



__________________

I know I'm biased. What's wrong with that?

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard