"We wish to confirm that the embargo placed upon the Club remains in force at the present time as a result of the Football Conference taking the view that the Club do not have an acceptable agreement in place with the HMRC in respect of the monies due (notwithstanding the adjournment of the winding up petition which the HMRC did not oppose, and their acceptance of the part payment of arrears together with all current tax and VAT being paid up to date).
The Football Conference have also withheld payment of solidarity monies of £8,000 to the Club.
Further attempts to resolve this matter will be made by the Club's solicitors Leathes Prior on Monday (Sept 13), in advance of a Football Conference Hearing due to be heard in London on Thurs Sept 16th."
__________________
YOUTH are the future
****
"The worst thing you can do is make a committment and not meet it and I understand that." Barrie Hobbins 14 August 2010
Clear victimisation from Strudwick if he hasnt given us our 8k!! Ilkeston were in embargo and up in court on a winding up ORDER and got their 8k this is completely laughable.
LOL we have an agreement, have complied with HMRC wanting PAYE up to date, and they didnt object to the adjournment to pay the money within 14 weeks and he keeps the embargo. Despite being quoted as saying if a club has an agreement with HMRC we will lift it.
Then other clubs who owed more and were in court get no embargo!
More holes in the conference rules than a sieve. Any decent legal team aware of the facts and how the conference adhere or rather dont adhere to their own rules will rip them to bits.
The embargo when we have 2 contracted players who cannot play and we have to play players who are injured is another matter we can win. And Strudwick allowed one of the Blue Square Bet South teams in embargo to sign a player recently.
-- Edited by JgFc on Saturday 11th of September 2010 02:59:36 AM
__________________
Alexander O'Neal 1987 "I'm fed up cos all you wanna do is criticize "
I take it this £8,000 is from the Premier League payment? IF so when they gave it to non league football did it have a clause stating 'clubs owing money to HMRC should not get it'. I bet not. The money is due to the clubs competing in the leagues. I doubt there were any clauses.
£8k will help the club - why hold it back? The only obviously answer is the conference are scared we'll go under and lose their 8k. Shocking to think that a league will gamble with one of their member clubs future to save 8k.
Embargo - fine if it's the same for all clubs but it's not.
No deal with the HMRC? Why did we go to court then and get an arrangement to pay back money in 14 weeks time.
This situation from the league is very suspicious.
If we've broken the rules and this is a specified punishment, fine. However, I'm still not clear what the rule is that we've broken; what does it actually say and does it specify the sanctions that should be made?
As JGFC rightly says, the Conference seems to treat clubs in this position very inconsistently. All we want is to be given the same treatment as the others who've been in such a position recently.
Surely notes from the court case / a letter from the HMRC is all we need to prove we have an agreement in place. All seems a bit petty from the Conference.
I obviously don't know the details but there's a big difference between the petition being adjourned for 14 weeks because Welling have made some significant payments and there's potential for the debt being cleared and an arrangement to pay HMRC. If we had agreed with HMRC that we would pay £x per month commencing ddmmyy that is an arrangement to pay and I think the Conference would struggle to maintain the embargo on the rules that I've seen but if Welling had gone down that route and hadn't kept up the payments then things would have been difficult. If it has been simply adjourned we probably remain in breach of the rules and the Conference must apply them, otherwise they would have to scrap them completely. If you start applying them inconsistently the clubs that are treated more harshly would inevitably take action against them. Remember these are new rules so you can't compare what's gone on in the past. I'm not sticking up for the Conference either, the Hampton ground grading fiasco demonstrated that they are basically clueless.
I feel it's time to run another article on Welling United's troubles, and following the club's statement this morning, I would like to hear from supporters with details of their fundraising activities, and your views on the transfer embargo and the Conference withholding £8k, just to highlight the club's troubles a litlte bit more.
Please can you contact my by clicking on the CONTACT US button on kentishfootball.co.uk and please include your real name.
Look forward to hearing your views - please send them to be by 9pm Saturday.
Thank you. Stephen McCartney Editor www.kentishfootball.co.uk
Surely if there was not some sort of formal agreement with HMRC be it an agreement to pay £x pm or to pay off all/as much of the debt as is possible by the date of the next hearing there would have been no adjournment and the judge would have made a ruling re the winding up petition. That being the case HMRC are giving us a chance and the questions is why aren't the Conference?
As far as the £8K goes if it is the Premier League money surely it is intended to go to give clubs budgets a boost and not sit in the coffers of the Conference. Will we get interest if it is finally released as the Conference will no doubt have earned some while they are 'looking after it'?
Whilst we should never have got into the mess we are in and I don't know all the facts it just seems to me that far from helping as HMRC are the Conference, perhaps through hastily drawn up and poorly drafted rules, are piling more troubles on us.
__________________
YOUTH are the future
****
"The worst thing you can do is make a committment and not meet it and I understand that." Barrie Hobbins 14 August 2010
Other embargoed clubs/hmrc court case can sign players we cant. Other embargoed/hmrc court case clubs get the 8k we dont We have 2 players contracted that the conference wont let play Lewes owed more and were in court and had no embargo.
The top 3 look water tight that we can and should reverse on appeal. They cannot treat teams differently to us and in the top 2 points they clearly have done and they have done it in the last few DAYS. The 3rd point is restraint of trade and they forced us to de register the 2 players. Bearing how crap the conference are at implementing fair and consistent rules i would highly doubt any significant rule change has come in since lewes owed 115k
Then we have the negligence to our players from the conference. I would also highlight the piece in the non league paper where Chairmen are quoted that at the AGM some rules were changed without people knowing what they were voting on as the order and number of agenda items was mixed up.
__________________
Alexander O'Neal 1987 "I'm fed up cos all you wanna do is criticize "
The thrust of my opinion is that the creditors, HMRC, are being helpful and the Conference on the face of it appear to be obstructing our ability to respond to the helpful stance of our creditor. The £8K which they are withholding is 12.5% of the outstanding debt.
I can understand not being able to sign new players whilst we resolve the matter but not being able to register those we had already signed (who despite the problem remain committed to the Club) and are paying is to say the very least unhelpful to the Club and ultimately, if it has not already done so, brings about an unsatisifactory degree of inequality yet equality seems to be a 'buzzword' of the Conference. In 2 weeks time even if they allowed the registration of Clarkey and Pires we still can't field the permitted 11 + 7 on the bench for our FA Cup tie.
There should also be a facility for emergency registration of non contract/loan players in the event that we have an injury crisis - what happens if Charlie, who has played some games heavily strapped, was unable to play? Is there this facility for a Club under a player embargo?
-- Edited by bruno on Saturday 11th of September 2010 11:33:20 AM
__________________
YOUTH are the future
****
"The worst thing you can do is make a committment and not meet it and I understand that." Barrie Hobbins 14 August 2010
The 8k will come off the debt we owe, as the Conference will forward to HMRC. So thats 55k to raise now. I suspect Barrie was expecting this ... he made reference to it at the last meeting.
I wish I had your confidence Kevin. The £8k in terms of the infamous 'equality' should be given to WUFC. Not sure that the Conference can pay directly to HMRC.
__________________
YOUTH are the future
****
"The worst thing you can do is make a committment and not meet it and I understand that." Barrie Hobbins 14 August 2010
Also, note the wording ... 8k WITHHELD. Makes sense to avoid us frittering it away ... but it ether goes to HMRC or it is forwarded to us once HMRC is cleared.
For example, imagine this ... we raise 55k of the 63k, and are 8k short at week 14 and are closed down ... whilst Conference hold 8k of "our" money ... it couldnt be allowed to happen.