Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Day says Pugh as good if not better than Sheringham


troll catcher

Status: Offline
Posts: 11491
Date:
Day says Pugh as good if not better than Sheringham
Permalink  
 


 

http://www.kentonline.co.uk/kentonline/sport/2011/october/20/andy_pugh.aspx

Also seems Loick till getting trouble from the injury he received when "a fat lump" trod on his hand. Hes had this for 6 weeks or more.

Faz apparantly fit for Saturday too.

Sheringham now signed for Bournemouth, would imagine they will enquire how much certain players would cost as a replacement. Would think if anyone in this league goes there it would be someone from Dover (to free up money for Forster) or Frannie Collin.

 

COYW

 



__________________

Alexander O'Neal 1987 "I'm fed up cos all you wanna do is criticize "

Trollspotting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Moo


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2962
Date:
RE: Day says Pugh as good if not better than Sheringham
Permalink  
 


I think Loick aggravated the hand injury when we had our penalty shout late in the match on Saturday. He was clutching his hand immediately after he was hauled over.

It amazes me that a league team would spend that money on a striker just because he's been in form for the first 10 games of the season. He's such an inconsistent player that I can't see him making it at league level; he could barely get in the Dartford team last season. I wish him well and hope to be proved wrong, but Pugh is much better than Sheringham ever was for us.

__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1722
Date:
RE: Day says Pugh as good if not better than Sheringham
Permalink  
 


Kentish football view and on the Eastleigh game

http://www.kentishfootball.co.uk/mambo/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7300&Itemid=37

__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1058
Date:
RE: Day says Pugh as good if not better than Sheringham
Permalink  
 


Good luck to Charlie. He did well for us and we earned a few bob out of him too.

I wouldn't swap him for Pugh though who's a better all round player.

Having watched a few games from the lower leagues games recently I can honestly say there's not much difference between their so called proffesionals and our players. Both Jack's would walk into Charlton's side at the moment. 



__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 5456
Date:
RE: Day says Pugh as good if not better than Sheringham
Permalink  
 


well lets start by winning this league and proving it...i really dont want to tout our players to all and sundry

__________________


troll catcher

Status: Offline
Posts: 11491
Date:
RE: Day says Pugh as good if not better than Sheringham
Permalink  
 


Mark its excellent for us if they attract attention, it will keep them on their toes and give us a bit of publicity. All i hope for is we dont allow them to leave for stupid money i also hope we dont hold clubs to ransom with stupid high fees (unless a big club comes in haha). As long as we dont allow ourselves to be bent over we will be fine and Players will see if they do the business they will get noticed and championship clubs sniffing.

Players will need no motivation all the time lots of scouts are watching them. Which helps us.




__________________

Alexander O'Neal 1987 "I'm fed up cos all you wanna do is criticize "

Trollspotting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard