Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: 3G Pitches


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1304
Date:
3G Pitches
Permalink  
 


Approved for use in the conference leagues from next season:

http://www.kentonline.co.uk/maidstone/sport/conference-yes-to-3g-21128/



__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1262
Date:
RE: 3G Pitches
Permalink  
 


Glad that common sense has prevailed, although the only snag is either need wealthy owner or wealthy (and supportive) council to stump up the £millions to install them.

__________________


Youth Team

Status: Offline
Posts: 78
Date:
3G Pitches
Permalink  
 


Was never in favour of them, but have to admit they do make sense now that they're not like the sandpaper carpet QPR used to play on. Less chance of wasted away trips too.



-- Edited by Blackfen on Thursday 31st of July 2014 06:02:56 PM

__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 5462
Date:
RE: 3G Pitches
Permalink  
 


What would happen for an FA Cup tie v a league side?



__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 1262
Date:
RE: 3G Pitches
Permalink  
 


MarkX wrote:

What would happen for an FA Cup tie v a league side?


 Greg Dyke is in support of them, and was the one that told the Conference to allow 3G pitches. So I assume the FA would give special dispensation.

Like someone else said it's not like the old days of Preston N.E and Oldham, where nobody wanted to go into a tackle for fear of losing several layers of skin. Although I do wonder if teams playing Maidstone go into games with a slight level of uncertainty in their mind.



__________________


Club Captain

Status: Offline
Posts: 628
Date:
RE: 3G Pitches
Permalink  
 


MarkX wrote:

What would happen for an FA Cup tie v a league side?


Nothing.

I'm still not in favour of them. They're much better than they were but they're slow when passing along the ground.



__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 2395
Date:
RE: 3G Pitches
Permalink  
 


The pitch at Samuel Monatgue where the reserves played last season (and the first team trained) is a 4G pitch and seemed very good. The benefit at PVR would be it could be used for training, the Academy and Reserves in addition to first team matches.  All we need is for a big winner on the EuroMillions and we are sorted.



__________________

David C in the WUSA shop



Youth Team

Status: Offline
Posts: 88
Date:
RE: 3G Pitches
Permalink  
 


I was in Glasgow for the Commonwealth Games over the weekend & went to a game at Clyde while I was there. They have a new 3G pitch - this was the first game on a plastic pitch I've seen since Preston back in the 80s & the diffrence is huge. After 10 minutes you forgot they were playing on plastic & it was just a normal game. If anything it was a better game than most I've seen at that level as the pitch encouraged them to keep the ball down & play better football.

__________________


Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 7016
Date:
RE: 3G Pitches
Permalink  
 


What I don't understand is how the Conference can call an EGM to ask member clubs whether they want them, accept the no vote returned, then six months later announce them to be acceptable.

I have seen the development side play at Sammy Montague and while I was standing at the side a huge clearance came straight at me. I was expecting to have to field it or take evasive action only to see it bounce miles over my head and crash into the caged fencing. As a result, I'm still opposed.



__________________

I know I'm biased. What's wrong with that?



Club Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 5462
Date:
RE: 3G Pitches
Permalink  
 


Yes me too....conditions are great levellers too!!

__________________


Club Captain

Status: Offline
Posts: 645
Date:
RE: 3G Pitches
Permalink  
 


I believe earlier this year after the conference voted against them the FA said that they could be used in the FA cup competition

__________________

 All postings lubricated by The Door Hinge Ale House 11 Welling High Street



First X1 Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 204
Date:
RE: 3G Pitches
Permalink  
 


'What I don't understand is how the Conference can call an EGM to ask member clubs whether they want them, accept the no vote returned, then six months later announce them to be acceptable'

'cos the Conference are t?@s

 



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard