Don't know why I'm bothering to respond but your statement "I am sure Bruno can confirm the post in question was not by Mark, as he has been very keen to do for JGFC in the past." is somewhat misleading. This has happened on 1 occasion when I was monitoring the activity on the site and the issue of the author of an anonymous post was raised.
I was not monitoring the activity on the forum when the post now in question was made and can neither categorically state that it was or was not made by Mark - however, as Mark has said he posts in his own name, and of late that has been the case as far as I am aware. In my view it is therefore unlikely that he was the author of the post.
__________________
YOUTH are the future
****
"The worst thing you can do is make a committment and not meet it and I understand that." Barrie Hobbins 14 August 2010
And you wonder why i would prefer qualified successful people involved. If you fance a pint i'll meet up with you or you can call me on 07915 267 279
Is JGFC going to provide an update? Prob no............... as again he is proved wrong!
I would suggest the Youth (Community) section is none of his business! Leave the youngsters out of this JGFC, please.
All YOU have done lately is post 6 or 7 anonymous digs! Are you going to say who you are, or continue to show you have no bollox?
Im just going to ignore whatever you write because its anonymous and deserves no credence or futeure response.
Am i gonna make a response? Try reading the Youth thread you prize toby!
This prize toby notes my original post was dated 16th May and your Youth thread 17th May - not rocket science really. And does it really make a difference whether anonymous or not - you are very good at having personal digs with no evidence.
Bollox in the true sense of the word no, I don't have, being a woman that would be quite worrying. But, bollox as in having the audacity to debate with you, I do have. But seeing as you won't respond unless I make up a user name - well, it's been interesting JGFC, but none of your postings have changed my view.
Interesting you quote number of postings when Bruno suggests this is not 100% accurate when looking at IP - can you accept all anons were not from me?
It is a shame, I fully admit, you are not 100% with the club, as your energy would be a force to be reckoned with.
Anonymous To be pedantic I said I was not monitoring posts at the point in time when the anonymous post which JgFc suggested was from Mark X was made. Having now gone back through the IP's and with the benefit of your post it is quite clear that it was not Mark X.
Just a point about user names, whilst many of us use pseudonyms on forums we tend to use the same identity on all football forums and others are able to relate to that identity whether they know you personally or not. In the case of anonymous postings it could be several people sharing an opinion or just one person, the reader has no idea which is the case and it makes it difficult, nay impossible, to gauge the extent of support for/ disagreement with an opinion expressed. My several times mentioned suggestion that a signature is added at the end of an anonymous posting, though not perfect does help but registering and always using an identity (made up or otherwise) ensures that readers know it is you posting.
__________________
YOUTH are the future
****
"The worst thing you can do is make a committment and not meet it and I understand that." Barrie Hobbins 14 August 2010