what a load of rubbish - he couldnt have played for bromley anyway because he was offered engaged terms by Welling and was under 24. Fordy would have had to given his permission and I can't see that would have happened!
Academic as he signed for us he is obviously happy to stay at Welling but if he had really wanted to go to Bromley for whatever reason I'm sure Fordy would have let him go as he wants players who want to play for the Club. The point of offering him terms was that if another Club came in for him we would get a fee.
__________________
YOUTH are the future
****
"The worst thing you can do is make a committment and not meet it and I understand that." Barrie Hobbins 14 August 2010
So according to you Anon, if someone is under 24, whether they are on contract on not, if they are made an offer they can only leave for another club if granted permission ?? hmm.
perhaps you need to re-read the post; it says that he couldnt have PLAYED for Bromley as the article suggested and as we all know this only applies to players under contract of course Muku could have signed for Bromley and if a fee was not agreed it would have gone to tribunal aka Kedwell - the point being if Bromley wanted him that badly why would they need to see him play a game before they sign him! if you want me to draw you a picture....
we may still have to go to triubunal this season as Sinclair is yet to sign
that may be what you meant, but certainly not what you wrote ....
what a load of rubbish - he couldnt have played for bromley anyway because he was offered engaged terms by Welling and was under 24. Fordy would have had to given his permission and I can't see that would have happened!
"Fordy would have to give permission" - I think not. Smith, until he signed last week, was free to do what he wanted.
if you read the article again the bromley manager says he was interested but that he wanted to see muku play a game for them first - my point was and always has been that because he was offered a new contract and was under 24 then TO PLAY IN A GAME for Bromley FORDY WOULD HAVE HAD TO GIVE HIS PERMISSION. if he wanted to go and Bromley wanted to pay a fee without seeing him then of course that could have happened
on another note it will be interesting to see how far he develops as a player this season because he has got bags of ability
As far as I have heard there were several clubs sniffing around Tony Sinclair and Fordy likes the look of him though he has seen very little opportunity to assess him. I've not heard that he wants away but knowing the interest the Club did the sensible thing and offered him terms.
OK he may not have signed yet but that could be for any number of reasons and if he were to go to a higher level of football I don't see the problem. My view would be different if there was no lasting damage from his injury and he went to he went to another Conference South club or a lower League purely for the money.
Lets not get uptight over something which hasn't yet presented itself.
__________________
YOUTH are the future
****
"The worst thing you can do is make a committment and not meet it and I understand that." Barrie Hobbins 14 August 2010
yea mark your right he's got mad potention he will be a asset to the club this season and member last season was his first at this level so he will be even better this season
Lets hope we get £25,000 and 50% because come on lads lets admit it , it would be a severe blow to lose a player of Tony's calibre.
He is obviously destined for Cappello's team and Grays should pay what he is worth. Lets all pray Tony Stays, you dont replace legends like Townsend, Abbott, Finnan and Sinclair easily.
__________________
Alexander O'Neal 1987 "I'm fed up cos all you wanna do is criticize "
