Good report just ignore the time of the winner and the scorer of the first...
Probably the worst, briefest, and most inaccurate and pointless match report I have ever read. Other than getting the names of the two teams correct I see little else.
Im trying to work out if bundled over in the box is a similie for olympic class dive.
Two different players credited with the first goal at different points of the report and claiming that Andy Pugh scored directly from a free kick is sufficient to make me doubt the writer's eye-sight. He offence for the second half penalty was well beyond his range of vision so he probably made it up!!
Im trying to work out if bundled over in the box is a similie for olympic class dive.
Two different players credited with the first goal at different points of the report and claiming that Andy Pugh scored directly from a free kick is sufficient to make me doubt the writer's eye-sight. He offence for the second half penalty was well beyond his range of vision so he probably made it up!!
According to one report above we won a tackle on the edge of the box and Faz then drove the ball into the box for Pugh ... when in reality it was a foul against a Welling player and the cross came from a free kick. Im glad I make 95% of the games because some of these reports are not only biased (sort of understandable as wriitten by a fan usually), but completely inaccurate.