Danson Mark wrote:

---

Squarevanman wrote:

---

BOOM BOOM BALLY wrote:

---

bruno wrote:

---

Kevin wrote:

---

the gimp wrote:

---

Have this club got any ambition? That's it sell all our best players had a feeling the club did not want to go up this year should have kept the players use the money from the playoffs too keep them.Feel sorry for Jamie

-- Edited by the gimp on Friday 25th of May 2012 02:50:06 PM

---

 Probably not, but all the same we havent sold a player have we ?? Also, we didnt make any money from the play-offs.

---

 I doubt we made much from the playoff final but don't try and tell me we didn't make any money from the home semi final match against Sutton.

---

 Would have assumed like FA Cup game - After cost incurred the surplus nis split between 2 teams except no money to FA

---

 From what I understood after expenses (and they must have been high as I saw 7 police wagons in the car park) 50% to the league and 25% each to the 2 clubs.

---

 As suggested by Bruno, I would have thought little would have been made out of the decider but the Sutton home game should have made some money. Players did have to be paid for two additional weeks though, and that has to be taken into account.

---

 Normally non league players contracts are for 39 / 40 weeks so addt players offs games would not mean more weeks money