Sky Sports have us winning 1-2. Got my hopes up for a minute.

Sky sports thinks we won.

Ashford Wing wrote:

---

4 subs is concerning.

JoeBo isn't going to change the game if you need a goal. Daisy won't play unless he absolutely has to, and KHM isn't fit. Would have been nice to see an Ouani, Webb, Corne etc if possible just to have the option. Hopefully it won't be needed

---

 I believe Callum Webb is injured.

Calm dooooooooooooooooooooooon about kids bench warming LOL. I think Supporters going to games and making noise would be more advantageous to us than taking a 17 year old to sit on a bench... I think we took about 60 to Hereford, thats pathetic on a Saturday and Thurrock-esque (Those that went were good as always). I know Dartford have failed to run a coach and Woking too and some people are struggling but Groupsave made the trip pretty cheap.

Groupsave was £23,WUSA offered to run a coach . Lead from the front. shouting the team on would be much more use than having a youngster sit on a bench for 90 minutes.

Harry was there on Saturday, Kurtis was there and failed a fitness test. Its not as if we went there with no players for the bench.

The only part i agree with, is name 5 subs even if they arent fit. Dont show any weakness to the oppo,

Webb needs a scan, Harry wasnt quite ready, Kurtis failed a fitness test before Hereford all said by Jamie after Hereford.

Tom, stop having such thinly veiled digs at me on a public forum re: my attendance or whatever I post. You couldn't handle it in private the other day and are obviously still stewing over it. I'll assume I can have my say on here seeing as you've posted malicious rubbish ever since.

Not every fan can devote every minute of their lives to the club. Well done to those who do and go about it in a quiet manner with little fuss, I have genuine respect for your continued hard work and commitment that is key to the progress of the club. Not such a big "well done" to those who do likewise, but then try and make others feel inferior for not being able to make the same commitments. When this happens, you begin to question whether their hard work is motivated by the best interests of the club, or by the opportunity to inflate their own sense of self-importance by belittling others.

I notice you don't direct such criticisms at other supporters who have genuine, unavoidable reasons why they can't make it to every game. Is it because you're bitter that I'm not giving you 40 quid for WingsTV?

Just to nullify your point re: the minor debate you put in to your post as an excuse to have a dig, having noisy support or a full bench is hardly an either/or scenario. You can have both/neither. One, however, is controlled by Daisy. Whilst he does a truly remarkable job on a limited budget, if the general consensus is that he's made an error (not having a 5th sub when there are youngsters on dual registration) then we're entitled to discuss it and question why. If there's a viable answer, fair enough. In contrast, we're not going to come on the forum and say "Where were you, you and you on Saturday? Not coming to support the team. Useless".

For my part, I would say that I start far more chants than the average fan at the games I do attend. I apologise if my absence causes you a personal gut-wrenching agony. I'm sure I'll feel the same when you choose to take another 5 year stint away without attending a game - not that I have a problem with that, it's really none of my concern. But since you're going to have childish digs at me I may as well return the favour.

I look forward to your response which will no doubt be along the lines of "LOL! PMSL, You're a moron, always slagging off the players. I'm not even going to read that" followed by a crude avatar change, as per your recent posts. This will be followed by deletion a few hours later when you engage your brain and realise how it makes people perceive you. Or you could do the sensible thing and take up whatever issue you have with me privately, as both Polo and myself have requested.