I don't know the terms of their deals but I would assume they are due this summer.

Common sense would dictate they should be offered new deals, and should have been ages ago anyhow. The club should want to tie them down to new deals. I am sure they would welcome security, and pay-rises.

It was also mentioned at the WUSA meeting, and is recorded in the minutes, that it should be raised at the Board Meeting. Like it shouldn't have been without our prompting.

There is no reference to this at the Board Meeting in the write-up submitted by Malcolm.

Was it mentioned at the Board Meeting and has been overlooked in Malcolm's write-up, or was it not discussed? I suspect the latter.

If it is the latter then I am amazed, annoyed, and frankly we are waiting for disaster to strike. As shown by Franks, Dyer and Bergqvist, we can lose quality at any point, and rest assured, as soon as the manager goes, whenever that is, on to bigger and better things, which is inevitable given the job he has done, the rest will follow ... management team, players, the works. Bye bye Conf Prem.

Why has this not been addressed by the club? and, equally as important, why was it not raised at the Board Meeting as was expressly requested and recorded in the WUSA minutes? otherwise, why do we bother?

Or do we wait until it is too late and someone makes them an offer we could only dream of bettering.

In Jamie we trust ... without him, we're f**ked, let's be honest. We'd collapse like a pack of cards.

Sort it out WUFC. Can WUSA please please do something to raise this through proper channels ... waiting for the next meeting is too late. There will be another offer on the table by then, if not for Jamie, for most of his players. And if the players go, what reason is there for Jamie to stay on, other than he lives nearby. None.

Jamie, Barry, Frosty ... take the lead. Tell the club you want new deals. You deserve them. Become legends like the ones at the dinner Saturday night. Sign up.