Appreciate the sentiment but this is just mixed and a repeat of old messages.

If the job is too stressful don't do it. He has made that decision no once else and conflicts with the itching to get back in the dugout stuff.

Whenever times are tough under this tenure the old ground development stuff gets rolled.out.

Lastly same.repeated message about the results.

Sorry but need to demonstrate it rather than keep saying it.

The message is a joke, makes a mockery of his actions over the last few years, and shows him to be culpable of the mess, incapable of change (same things happening over and over), while charming everyone on the back of the stadium stuff.

MG has registered a new company, and is in the process of circumventing the CIC

That could be an outrageous fraud if set against the motives for setting up the CIC - no one would do that would they?

Over at AFC Wimbledon, the fans just blocked a capricious move by the CEO that would have a sell out the club to the founder of ASOS for 10-20% ownership......[drumroll], because they need a new stadium!

 

 

 

-- Edited by Wingman1963 on Tuesday 31st of December 2019 03:27:27 PM

Wingman

Thats out and out libel. Be very careful between criticising and accusing.

I think from the outside threes a feeling of you supporters being treated like mugs and its funny but feel a little sorry for the way youre treated. Its so wrong.
Then theres an odd post actually understanding his point of view and almost accepting it.
You could of still had Kingy at the helm and with his contacts you wouldnt need to over spend. But look who Im telling, you know better than I do.
Different clubs, rival supporters etc etc and all true but were all football fans and Im stunned how hes treated you lot and tried to justify it. The fact some appear to of accepted it is mind boggling.

TheGhostOfJodyBrown wrote:

---

Sadly we dont have a council to give us a £7 million stadium so we can be self sufficient and earn from 3g pitches, golf course, conference facilities and fly through the league like Dartford have.

---

 

One difference there being Darts own their stadium (or?), and what MG is trying to do is get the stadium in his hands by controlling the lease that Bexley "give" us . 

CIC will not own or control the ground.  WUFC's landlord is LBofB. WUFC's future landlord could be MG, or his cronies.

Be careful what you wish for.

-- Edited by Wingman1963 on Tuesday 31st of December 2019 04:03:35 PM

Wingman1963 wrote:

---

 

One difference there being Darts own their stadium 

-- Edited by Wingman1963 on Tuesday 31st of December 2019 04:03:35 PM

---

 Do they?

WUFC's landlord is LBofB

I think this is one the major problems over the past 30 plus years. The council have never updated PVR, backed the club, invested any time or interest whatsoever. They could have funded a plan to redevelop the ground themselves and created housing, jobs etc. When you look at how Thamesmead had money available to them a few years back and how other boroughs have backed Dartford, Cray and Bromley we really have been left behind.

 

We will have to see what happens in the new year but would having a new landlord be any worse?

 

My point was about the council pre-MG where they could have redeveloped the ground, not to financially help the club but simply provide up to date, safe facilities where they could have benefited from housing and other things. You only have to look at the terracing to see a landlord should be putting that right. Bromley have backed Crays new ground and Bexley backed Thamesmead. Hopefully Bexley might get behind us in the future.

Danson Mark wrote:

---

Wingman1963 wrote:

---

 

One difference there being Darts own their stadium 

-- Edited by Wingman1963 on Tuesday 31st of December 2019 04:03:35 PM

---

 Do they?

---

 

Yes we do. 

However we know weve been lucky and we appreciate it every day. 

In reality while we may have a little laugh at you down the road however I would think most rival supporters would want all clubs to have stability and a future  (I am not saying you dont but from the outside looking in it seems a concern) 

were all football fans and love our clubs so I want to beat you guys on and off the pitch and love the derbies but hope everything else at your club enables you to use support your team with no other worries. 

 

 

Would imagine a load of that money came from the EU in regeneration budgets for the run down area of Thamesmead,

And the LBoB still own the old Thamesmead's old ground.

The asset has NOT been stripped. It's STILL a community asset. OWNED by the council, who are there to SERVE the borough residents

If MG owns the lease that's currently owned by the club, then invites others to invest in a new ground, using that lease.......is that asset stripped?

Rather than paying the council, who then reinvest that money back in the borough we will be paying MG.

.............Crayford United here we come. :)

Lbob do not own theamsmeads old ground, Peabody do.

And yes, the CIC will end up paying rent into the NewCo which will.be made up of investors, no doubt about that.

Thanks Dave not been attending that many seasons
I think Eric signed extension to the one your referring about

Happy to be corrected.

Thanks Tom

I know it can mean nothing
But I asked if we did sign new lease or not ?

With regards to new ground not much land around these days in LB of bexley.

dfc wrote:

---

Danson Mark wrote:

---

Wingman1963 wrote:

---

 

One difference there being Darts own their stadium 

-- Edited by Wingman1963 on Tuesday 31st of December 2019 04:03:35 PM

---

 Do they?

---

 

Yes we do. 

However we know weve been lucky and we appreciate it every day. 

In reality while we may have a little laugh at you down the road however I would think most rival supporters would want all clubs to have stability and a future  (I am not saying you dont but from the outside looking in it seems a concern) 

were all football fans and love our clubs so I want to beat you guys on and off the pitch and love the derbies but hope everything else at your club enables you to use support your team with no other worries. 

 

 

---

No, Dartford do not own the stadium, the council very kindly built and paid for it but it's still council owned.

We used to own Watling Street, a fat lot of good that did us, it just made a handful of people rich at the supporters expense. 

I feel your pain and like most Darts' fans, I sincerely hope you guys survive whatever it is that's going on at your club.

I can't pretend that it wasn't a lot of fun for us today, but we can each only have fun days like this if both our clubs survive.

Good luck with the fight.

TheGhostOfJodyBrown wrote:

---

If MG does step down lets hope its Garry Hill or Chris Kinnear and not an ex Bromley player.

---

 Neither would work for him, I reckon Sean Francis could have a good chance though....

Someone properly worse than Goldberg.

Another mate to the players!